California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 65
Page 24
... jury are to be deferred it necessarily must fall within the constitutional prerogative of the jury to determine the quantum of those damages and the collateral issues subsumed within that issue , including the period over which the ...
... jury are to be deferred it necessarily must fall within the constitutional prerogative of the jury to determine the quantum of those damages and the collateral issues subsumed within that issue , including the period over which the ...
Page 25
... jury's own determination and may effectively produce a result different from what the jury intended . The clearest illustration to this is where the jury returns a lump sum future damages verdict which it has discounted to present value ...
... jury's own determination and may effectively produce a result different from what the jury intended . The clearest illustration to this is where the jury returns a lump sum future damages verdict which it has discounted to present value ...
Page 26
... jury intended . ... Both material misdirection of a jury in the instruction of its task and improper interference with its verdict , once returned , have been held to infringe the constitutional right to trial by jury . See e.g. Jehl v ...
... jury intended . ... Both material misdirection of a jury in the instruction of its task and improper interference with its verdict , once returned , have been held to infringe the constitutional right to trial by jury . See e.g. Jehl v ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning