California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 29
Page 10
... judgment [ but not the jury's verdict ] to specify the amount , periodicity and " the recipient or recipients of the payments ; " ( c ) provides that " the court which rendered the original judgment " can modify the judgment only upon ...
... judgment [ but not the jury's verdict ] to specify the amount , periodicity and " the recipient or recipients of the payments ; " ( c ) provides that " the court which rendered the original judgment " can modify the judgment only upon ...
Page 13
... judgment which related to future medical needs ; instead it encom- passes all future damages whether problematical or certain , income loss or medical , immediate or distant . In its earliest forms it was de- signed to require the jury ...
... judgment which related to future medical needs ; instead it encom- passes all future damages whether problematical or certain , income loss or medical , immediate or distant . In its earliest forms it was de- signed to require the jury ...
Page 18
... judgment for damages in tort and , indeed , virtually all other court proceedings is awarded and payable in a lump sum upon the judgment becoming final . This exception applies only if the injured person is a victim of a " health care ...
... judgment for damages in tort and , indeed , virtually all other court proceedings is awarded and payable in a lump sum upon the judgment becoming final . This exception applies only if the injured person is a victim of a " health care ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning