California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 11
Page 83
... indicated above this can be a medical friend , or perhaps a young resident at some of our teaching hospitals who wants to make some extra money by some outside " moonlighting . " The purpose of this first " expert " is to educate you ...
... indicated above this can be a medical friend , or perhaps a young resident at some of our teaching hospitals who wants to make some extra money by some outside " moonlighting . " The purpose of this first " expert " is to educate you ...
Page 86
... indicated only a one year or even shorter delay . If there are witnesses available who back up the patient ( client ) version , this should be pointed out in your summary . Physicians including your own experts seem curiously " bound ...
... indicated only a one year or even shorter delay . If there are witnesses available who back up the patient ( client ) version , this should be pointed out in your summary . Physicians including your own experts seem curiously " bound ...
Page 115
... indicated in dictum the duty of a landlord would not be exempt from the broad application of Civil Code ยง1714 and the Rowland doctrine . In Fakhoury v . Magner ( 1972 ) 25 C.A.3d 58 , 63 , an Appellate Court in dictum reverted back to ...
... indicated in dictum the duty of a landlord would not be exempt from the broad application of Civil Code ยง1714 and the Rowland doctrine . In Fakhoury v . Magner ( 1972 ) 25 C.A.3d 58 , 63 , an Appellate Court in dictum reverted back to ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning