California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 32
Page 109
... held , in essence , that an indemnity action , unlike a primary or original action , does not accrue for statute of limitation purposes at the same time it accrues in the primary action . The court further held that the fact that the ...
... held , in essence , that an indemnity action , unlike a primary or original action , does not accrue for statute of limitation purposes at the same time it accrues in the primary action . The court further held that the fact that the ...
Page 65
... held that the negligence of a special employee who injured another of the special employer's workers would not bar the victim from an action for damages against the general employer or agency ( respondeat superior principles ) and the ...
... held that the negligence of a special employee who injured another of the special employer's workers would not bar the victim from an action for damages against the general employer or agency ( respondeat superior principles ) and the ...
Page 80
... held to subject the employer to civil liability and the employee was not limited to workers compensation ) . Alcorn v . Ambro Engineering ( 1970 ) 2 Cal.3d 493 , 86 Cal . Reporter 88 ( nervous shock due to racist epithets and ...
... held to subject the employer to civil liability and the employee was not limited to workers compensation ) . Alcorn v . Ambro Engineering ( 1970 ) 2 Cal.3d 493 , 86 Cal . Reporter 88 ( nervous shock due to racist epithets and ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning