California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 7
Page 56
... Ground fault or other devices can be included to prevent electrical shock due to a short circuit or broken wire . Several hazards can be mitigated through the application of quality control and inspection procedures . These procedures ...
... Ground fault or other devices can be included to prevent electrical shock due to a short circuit or broken wire . Several hazards can be mitigated through the application of quality control and inspection procedures . These procedures ...
Page 60
... Ground , " 56 N.C.L. Rev. 643 ( 1978 ) . “ California Strict Products Liability , ” 9 Pacific Law Journal 775-882 ( 1978 ) . Blalock and Molinari , " The Failure to Warn Defect After Barker v . Lull Engineering Co .: Preservation of the ...
... Ground , " 56 N.C.L. Rev. 643 ( 1978 ) . “ California Strict Products Liability , ” 9 Pacific Law Journal 775-882 ( 1978 ) . Blalock and Molinari , " The Failure to Warn Defect After Barker v . Lull Engineering Co .: Preservation of the ...
Page 11
... ground for challenge for cause of any particular propsective juror , voir dire is also an accepted means by which counsel determines those propsective jurors who should , from a practical standpoint , be challenged preemptorily ...
... ground for challenge for cause of any particular propsective juror , voir dire is also an accepted means by which counsel determines those propsective jurors who should , from a practical standpoint , be challenged preemptorily ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning