California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 11
Page 97
... going to have a relatively poor idea of just what the doctor's testimony is going to be . On the other hand , if there is either a re- port composed by the expert for the attorney , or if a discussion is committed to a tape recording ...
... going to have a relatively poor idea of just what the doctor's testimony is going to be . On the other hand , if there is either a re- port composed by the expert for the attorney , or if a discussion is committed to a tape recording ...
Page 98
... going to compose a report , he and the attorney should carefully discuss it in advance because once the report is composed , if there are errors in it the doctor is not going to be able to simply " junk " one or two pages of the report ...
... going to compose a report , he and the attorney should carefully discuss it in advance because once the report is composed , if there are errors in it the doctor is not going to be able to simply " junk " one or two pages of the report ...
Page 99
... going to be faced with paying the doctor at the very least - for a full day's testimony , which is going to cost aside from preparation - at least $ 1,000 to $ 2,000 in the average case , and much more than that if more days are ...
... going to be faced with paying the doctor at the very least - for a full day's testimony , which is going to cost aside from preparation - at least $ 1,000 to $ 2,000 in the average case , and much more than that if more days are ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning