California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 56
Page 78
... expert witnesses during trial and may be framed upon any theory that can be reasonably deduced within the factual limits of the evidence . Am - Cal . Investment Company v . Sharlyn Estates Incor- porated , 255 Cal . App . 2d 526 , 63 ...
... expert witnesses during trial and may be framed upon any theory that can be reasonably deduced within the factual limits of the evidence . Am - Cal . Investment Company v . Sharlyn Estates Incor- porated , 255 Cal . App . 2d 526 , 63 ...
Page 81
... expert . Nor will he be able to successfully prosecute the many other phases of his case . HOW THE ATTORNEY SHOULD PREPARE HIMSELF ( HERSELF ) TO FIND AND USE THE MEDICAL EXPERT Locating the medical expert is not easy because it is a ...
... expert . Nor will he be able to successfully prosecute the many other phases of his case . HOW THE ATTORNEY SHOULD PREPARE HIMSELF ( HERSELF ) TO FIND AND USE THE MEDICAL EXPERT Locating the medical expert is not easy because it is a ...
Page 21
... expert . Perkins v . Sunset Telephone and Telegraph , ( 1909 ) 155 Cal . 712 , 103 P. 190 . Using portions of such " hypothetical questions " where affirma- tive testimony by the defendant expert witness will tend to corrobo- rate ...
... expert . Perkins v . Sunset Telephone and Telegraph , ( 1909 ) 155 Cal . 712 , 103 P. 190 . Using portions of such " hypothetical questions " where affirma- tive testimony by the defendant expert witness will tend to corrobo- rate ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning