California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 30
Page 86
... example , your summary may disclose that the doctor was informed of the lump three years before surgery whereas the doctor indicated only a one year or even shorter delay . If there are witnesses available who back up the patient ...
... example , your summary may disclose that the doctor was informed of the lump three years before surgery whereas the doctor indicated only a one year or even shorter delay . If there are witnesses available who back up the patient ...
Page 90
... example , in our breast cancer example one of the most important witnesses will be your " oncologist " - a specialist in tumor growth , diagnosis and treatment . This specialist may be an internist or surgeon . There are many available ...
... example , in our breast cancer example one of the most important witnesses will be your " oncologist " - a specialist in tumor growth , diagnosis and treatment . This specialist may be an internist or surgeon . There are many available ...
Page 98
... example of such a circumstance and note the trial court's in- struction set forth in the opinion . In the medical setting the conditions of res ipsa may be estab- lished without expert testimony in the rare case where common knowledge ...
... example of such a circumstance and note the trial court's in- struction set forth in the opinion . In the medical setting the conditions of res ipsa may be estab- lished without expert testimony in the rare case where common knowledge ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning