California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 54
Page 25
evidence of pain , suffering , emotional distress or significant nota- tions of any of these would be utilized in the course of cross- examination , and referred to as part of the evidence , later to be utilized in presenting evidence ...
evidence of pain , suffering , emotional distress or significant nota- tions of any of these would be utilized in the course of cross- examination , and referred to as part of the evidence , later to be utilized in presenting evidence ...
Page 99
... evidence , a presumption of negligence arises , and California Evidence Code Section 646 ( c ) requires that the defendant must introduce evidence " ... which would support a finding that he was not negligent or that any negligence on ...
... evidence , a presumption of negligence arises , and California Evidence Code Section 646 ( c ) requires that the defendant must introduce evidence " ... which would support a finding that he was not negligent or that any negligence on ...
Page 101
... evidence to carry its burden . ( For examples see Witkin , California Evidence 2d , §267 . ) If the trial court rules that the defendant's evidence does overcome the presumption , additional instructions should be sub- mitted to combat ...
... evidence to carry its burden . ( For examples see Witkin , California Evidence 2d , §267 . ) If the trial court rules that the defendant's evidence does overcome the presumption , additional instructions should be sub- mitted to combat ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning