California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 26
Page 31
... events at which the trend of all future events , esp . for better or for worse , is determined ; turning point . 2. The point in a play or story at which holtile elements are most tensely opposed to each other . " 2. " A Legislator's ...
... events at which the trend of all future events , esp . for better or for worse , is determined ; turning point . 2. The point in a play or story at which holtile elements are most tensely opposed to each other . " 2. " A Legislator's ...
Page 50
... event and the consequences of that event . Risks are calculated by multiplying the likelihood of each event by the consequences . 1 ) Risk can be lowered by reducing the likelihood of an accident and / or reducing the consequences of ...
... event and the consequences of that event . Risks are calculated by multiplying the likelihood of each event by the consequences . 1 ) Risk can be lowered by reducing the likelihood of an accident and / or reducing the consequences of ...
Page 16
... event any of the original jurors is discharged , without the additional expense of selecting alternate jurors . Even with one or more alternate jurors , it is common , where possible , to stipulate to a lesser number of jurors in the event ...
... event any of the original jurors is discharged , without the additional expense of selecting alternate jurors . Even with one or more alternate jurors , it is common , where possible , to stipulate to a lesser number of jurors in the event ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning