California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 27
Page 41
... evaluating whether a risk is excessive is the relationship between safety and risk . Risk is a function of the ... evaluation of use patterns , accidents , and near misses . Safety engineering techniques such as hazards , failure ...
... evaluating whether a risk is excessive is the relationship between safety and risk . Risk is a function of the ... evaluation of use patterns , accidents , and near misses . Safety engineering techniques such as hazards , failure ...
Page 43
... Evaluation of the risk associated with the product by determining the likelihood of injury and the conse- quences of failure . This evaluation is graphed to create the Product Safety Profile . 3 ) Evaluation of whether the risk can be ...
... Evaluation of the risk associated with the product by determining the likelihood of injury and the conse- quences of failure . This evaluation is graphed to create the Product Safety Profile . 3 ) Evaluation of whether the risk can be ...
Page 31
... evaluation of the Evidence Code , Section 776 witness , it is essential that the interrogator make the maximum use of any personality weaknesses of the witness that are apparent . If he is loquacious , open and informative , it may be ...
... evaluation of the Evidence Code , Section 776 witness , it is essential that the interrogator make the maximum use of any personality weaknesses of the witness that are apparent . If he is loquacious , open and informative , it may be ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning