California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 28
Page 54
... employer is asked to pay benefits , both the general and special employers are exempted from liability for damages . Such a double exemption is an interpretation of the statutes . A better interpreta- tion of the statute would harmonize ...
... employer is asked to pay benefits , both the general and special employers are exempted from liability for damages . Such a double exemption is an interpretation of the statutes . A better interpreta- tion of the statute would harmonize ...
Page 66
... employer , a wrongdoing defendant would effec- tively immunize itself from any liability whatsoever . A DISTINCTION THE BORROWED SERVANT DOCTRINE : VICARIOUS LIABILITY OF MULTIPLE EMPLOYERS TO THIRD PARTIES Liability of the employer to ...
... employer , a wrongdoing defendant would effec- tively immunize itself from any liability whatsoever . A DISTINCTION THE BORROWED SERVANT DOCTRINE : VICARIOUS LIABILITY OF MULTIPLE EMPLOYERS TO THIRD PARTIES Liability of the employer to ...
Page 74
... employer of record was uninsured , and unless the commission could bind another " employer for purposes of workers ' compensation liability , the injured worker would go un- compensated . Thus , in some of the early cases the courts ...
... employer of record was uninsured , and unless the commission could bind another " employer for purposes of workers ' compensation liability , the injured worker would go un- compensated . Thus , in some of the early cases the courts ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning