California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 15
Page 96
... discuss with the doctor the history in the hospital record which quotes the patient as telling the doctor that the lump was there for three years , but that the patient was reassured by the defendant doctor in question that it was ...
... discuss with the doctor the history in the hospital record which quotes the patient as telling the doctor that the lump was there for three years , but that the patient was reassured by the defendant doctor in question that it was ...
Page 97
... discussion is committed to a tape recording , there is always the possibility that ― despite the claims of " work product , " etc. , the defense can obtain this information and be in a much better position to cross - examine the doctor ...
... discussion is committed to a tape recording , there is always the possibility that ― despite the claims of " work product , " etc. , the defense can obtain this information and be in a much better position to cross - examine the doctor ...
Page 98
... discussion in which the key points are discussed between doctor and attorney . Whether or not this should be typed ... discussing the matter with the doctor over the months or years he can ( orally ) remind the doctor about the tape and ...
... discussion in which the key points are discussed between doctor and attorney . Whether or not this should be typed ... discussing the matter with the doctor over the months or years he can ( orally ) remind the doctor about the tape and ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning