California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 15
Page 73
... deposition . Under the provisions of C.C.P. Section 2037.7 , payment for such time expended by the expert in the deposition shall be paid by the party who noticed it within 5 days of receipt of an itemized statement from the expert ...
... deposition . Under the provisions of C.C.P. Section 2037.7 , payment for such time expended by the expert in the deposition shall be paid by the party who noticed it within 5 days of receipt of an itemized statement from the expert ...
Page 75
... deposition . The best technique involves the personal reading and studying of all available depositions by the attorney who is to try the case . He should abstract pertinent portions , and make notes regarding the testimony . Only with ...
... deposition . The best technique involves the personal reading and studying of all available depositions by the attorney who is to try the case . He should abstract pertinent portions , and make notes regarding the testimony . Only with ...
Page 96
... deposition or trial , when it will be too late to resurrect your case . In other words , if the physician tells you one thing at the time of your conference and your discussions , but then ... deposition , or if no deposition , 96 96.
... deposition or trial , when it will be too late to resurrect your case . In other words , if the physician tells you one thing at the time of your conference and your discussions , but then ... deposition , or if no deposition , 96 96.
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning