California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 70
Page 109
... defendant may be barred by the statute of limitations does not bar an indemnity action by the named defendant against the responsible party . In the words of the court : [ California cases ] explicity hold that a tort defendant does not ...
... defendant may be barred by the statute of limitations does not bar an indemnity action by the named defendant against the responsible party . In the words of the court : [ California cases ] explicity hold that a tort defendant does not ...
Page 101
... defendant has not produced substantial evidence that the accident resulted from something other than the defendant's negligence or that the defendant exercised due care in all possible respects . The case law discussed above and other ...
... defendant has not produced substantial evidence that the accident resulted from something other than the defendant's negligence or that the defendant exercised due care in all possible respects . The case law discussed above and other ...
Page 105
accure to the defendant via Section 995 . If the magistrate erroneously refuses to hear a properly noticed motion to suppress evidence , the defendant has been denied a " substantial right " at the examination , and accordingly is ...
accure to the defendant via Section 995 . If the magistrate erroneously refuses to hear a properly noticed motion to suppress evidence , the defendant has been denied a " substantial right " at the examination , and accordingly is ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning