California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 24
Page 34
... against the danger it was supposed to guard , creates unreasonably dangerous side effects , and fails to minimize avoidable consequences in the event of an accident . An early attempt to define a product defect was made 34.
... against the danger it was supposed to guard , creates unreasonably dangerous side effects , and fails to minimize avoidable consequences in the event of an accident . An early attempt to define a product defect was made 34.
Page 35
... dangerous . " According to the Restatement , the term " unreasonably dangerous " is measured against the expectations of an ordinary consumer who purchased a product with the ordinary knowledge of the community as to its characteristics ...
... dangerous . " According to the Restatement , the term " unreasonably dangerous " is measured against the expectations of an ordinary consumer who purchased a product with the ordinary knowledge of the community as to its characteristics ...
Page 38
... dangers contemplated by the consumer . In Luque v . McLean , 12 decided the same day as Cronin , the court held that ... danger ' , or , in other words , if the jury finds that the risk of dan- ger inherent to the challenged design ...
... dangers contemplated by the consumer . In Luque v . McLean , 12 decided the same day as Cronin , the court held that ... danger ' , or , in other words , if the jury finds that the risk of dan- ger inherent to the challenged design ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning