California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 26
Page 30
... counsel , found a possible solution for it , and then eliminated the solution . It is significant that absolutely nothing in the MICRA acts as an impediment to physicians or insurance carriers from securing whatever fees they desire ...
... counsel , found a possible solution for it , and then eliminated the solution . It is significant that absolutely nothing in the MICRA acts as an impediment to physicians or insurance carriers from securing whatever fees they desire ...
Page 10
... counsel . The immediate advantage of such diversions is questionable , since opposing counsel can equal or exceed the initial distractions from the true purpose of jury trial . The larger interest of the trial bar as a whole , and of ...
... counsel . The immediate advantage of such diversions is questionable , since opposing counsel can equal or exceed the initial distractions from the true purpose of jury trial . The larger interest of the trial bar as a whole , and of ...
Page 11
... counsel lease such a service , assuming his inability to investigate the background of members of the jury panel by virtue of local rules that preclude such activity . Even if the " jury book " contains very little helpful information ...
... counsel lease such a service , assuming his inability to investigate the background of members of the jury panel by virtue of local rules that preclude such activity . Even if the " jury book " contains very little helpful information ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning