California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 17
Page 39
... conduct of the manufacturer distinction appears in attempting to differentiate between a manufacturing and design defect involving quality control . If the choice of a quality control plan is treated as a design decision subject to the ...
... conduct of the manufacturer distinction appears in attempting to differentiate between a manufacturing and design defect involving quality control . If the choice of a quality control plan is treated as a design decision subject to the ...
Page 43
... conduct . In the functional injury case , the plaintiff must advise the jury , particularly in voir dire , that the witness's manner and method of testifying may be distasteful to them . The jury will be asked to maintain an open mind ...
... conduct . In the functional injury case , the plaintiff must advise the jury , particularly in voir dire , that the witness's manner and method of testifying may be distasteful to them . The jury will be asked to maintain an open mind ...
Page 100
... conduct on the part of the defendant ; and ( 2 ) The jury shall not find that a proximate cause of the occurrence was some negligent conduct on the part of the defendant unless the jury believes , after weighing all the evidence in the ...
... conduct on the part of the defendant ; and ( 2 ) The jury shall not find that a proximate cause of the occurrence was some negligent conduct on the part of the defendant unless the jury believes , after weighing all the evidence in the ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning