California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 27
Page 9
... claiming that paid claims exceeded assets or even earned premiums , the basis asserted by the insurance industry for the panic was the inexplicably sudden perception of " IBNRs " - incurred but not reported claims . The problem was not ...
... claiming that paid claims exceeded assets or even earned premiums , the basis asserted by the insurance industry for the panic was the inexplicably sudden perception of " IBNRs " - incurred but not reported claims . The problem was not ...
Page 109
... claim against it ( which was governed by the Tort Claims Act ) 13 barred the indemni- ty action . The trial court disagreed , and overruled the State's demurrer . The State thereafter sought a writ of prohibition . A hearing was ...
... claim against it ( which was governed by the Tort Claims Act ) 13 barred the indemni- ty action . The trial court disagreed , and overruled the State's demurrer . The State thereafter sought a writ of prohibition . A hearing was ...
Page 93
... claims , especially the claims for extra - contractual and punitive damages , were preempted by the provisions of ERISA . The court in Eversole dismissed this contention , even though finding the insurer to be an ERISA fiduciary , 25 ...
... claims , especially the claims for extra - contractual and punitive damages , were preempted by the provisions of ERISA . The court in Eversole dismissed this contention , even though finding the insurer to be an ERISA fiduciary , 25 ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning