California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 64
Page 19
... causes , preexisting conditions , or successive events which create a conceptual problem of causation , legal cause or proximate cause , as a whole should be discussed in detail so that it will be clear in the minds of the jury . Such ...
... causes , preexisting conditions , or successive events which create a conceptual problem of causation , legal cause or proximate cause , as a whole should be discussed in detail so that it will be clear in the minds of the jury . Such ...
Page 38
... cause , legal cause , and the chain of causation resulting from the original negligent act or acts . The burden of proof is a matter that should be discussed in every argument so that the jury has a clear understanding of the burden of ...
... cause , legal cause , and the chain of causation resulting from the original negligent act or acts . The burden of proof is a matter that should be discussed in every argument so that the jury has a clear understanding of the burden of ...
Page 99
... cause of the injury . If these conditions are met by the evidence , a presumption of negligence arises , and California Evidence Code Section 646 ( c ) requires that the defendant must introduce evidence " ... which would support a ...
... cause of the injury . If these conditions are met by the evidence , a presumption of negligence arises , and California Evidence Code Section 646 ( c ) requires that the defendant must introduce evidence " ... which would support a ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning