California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 53
Page 29
... attorneys ' fees are calculated under this section . Why is the " total value " not the judgment itself ? Does this section somehow place the attorney in further jeopardy that the court may find the vaue of his services to be less than ...
... attorneys ' fees are calculated under this section . Why is the " total value " not the judgment itself ? Does this section somehow place the attorney in further jeopardy that the court may find the vaue of his services to be less than ...
Page 97
... attorney , or if a discussion is committed to a tape recording , there is always the possibility that ― despite the claims of " work product , " etc. , the defense can obtain this information and be in a much better position to cross ...
... attorney , or if a discussion is committed to a tape recording , there is always the possibility that ― despite the claims of " work product , " etc. , the defense can obtain this information and be in a much better position to cross ...
Page 98
... attorney , and then the attorney retains the tape in his possession , and the doctor does not listen to it or review a transcript before deposition or trial , it is less likely that the defense will be able to obtain it . On the other ...
... attorney , and then the attorney retains the tape in his possession , and the doctor does not listen to it or review a transcript before deposition or trial , it is less likely that the defense will be able to obtain it . On the other ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning