California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 21
Page 54
VI . APPLYING THE BARKER AND DALY TESTS The application of the Barker and Daly tests is best illustrated by example . A consumer curling iron34 is used to demonstrate how to determine if there is excessive preventable risk associated ...
VI . APPLYING THE BARKER AND DALY TESTS The application of the Barker and Daly tests is best illustrated by example . A consumer curling iron34 is used to demonstrate how to determine if there is excessive preventable risk associated ...
Page 115
... application of Rowland v . Christian between landlord and tenant , in Mark v . Pacific Gas & Electric Co. ( 1972 ) 7 C.3d 170 , 179 , the court clearly indicated in dictum the duty of a landlord would not be exempt from the broad ...
... application of Rowland v . Christian between landlord and tenant , in Mark v . Pacific Gas & Electric Co. ( 1972 ) 7 C.3d 170 , 179 , the court clearly indicated in dictum the duty of a landlord would not be exempt from the broad ...
Page 120
... Application of Strict Liability to Real Property At the first opportunity presented to our Appellate Courts to resolve the question of the applicability of strict liability to real property , acceptance was clear and decisive . Kreigler ...
... Application of Strict Liability to Real Property At the first opportunity presented to our Appellate Courts to resolve the question of the applicability of strict liability to real property , acceptance was clear and decisive . Kreigler ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning