California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 22
Page 105
... appealed . Plaintiffs , on appeal , contended that the ten year period did not commence until a particular home was completed or not until 1972 when the subdivision was substantially completed . The grading subcontractor 105.
... appealed . Plaintiffs , on appeal , contended that the ten year period did not commence until a particular home was completed or not until 1972 when the subdivision was substantially completed . The grading subcontractor 105.
Page 57
... appeals board will be accepted on appeal or review even though a contrary determination would likewise have been upheld . Consequently , the so - called " factors " which show employment or independent contract often appear to be ...
... appeals board will be accepted on appeal or review even though a contrary determination would likewise have been upheld . Consequently , the so - called " factors " which show employment or independent contract often appear to be ...
Page 64
... Appeal , under those facts , had little trouble finding special employment existed . In so deciding , howev- er , the court stated that : " We agree that , where the alleged special employer is not , at the time of the injury or in ...
... Appeal , under those facts , had little trouble finding special employment existed . In so deciding , howev- er , the court stated that : " We agree that , where the alleged special employer is not , at the time of the injury or in ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning