California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 16
Page 52
... WARNING , and CAUTION . The level of the hazard intensity is determined by the following definitions : DANGER WARNING CAUTION Imminent hazards which will result in severe personal injury or death . Hazards or unsafe practices which ...
... WARNING , and CAUTION . The level of the hazard intensity is determined by the following definitions : DANGER WARNING CAUTION Imminent hazards which will result in severe personal injury or death . Hazards or unsafe practices which ...
Page 55
... Warning Q.C. & compliance with U.L. Standard Warning & compliance with U.L. Standard Compliance with U.L. Standard Compliance with U.L. Standard ( access to bath ) Use outside , Severe - fatal Never - seldom Warning regarding water ...
... Warning Q.C. & compliance with U.L. Standard Warning & compliance with U.L. Standard Compliance with U.L. Standard Compliance with U.L. Standard ( access to bath ) Use outside , Severe - fatal Never - seldom Warning regarding water ...
Page 60
... Warnings in Products Liability Design Defect Litigation Comes of Age , " 61 Cornell Law Review 495 ( 1976 ) . 2 ... Warn Defect After Barker v . Lull Engineering Co .: Preservation of the Limited Duty and Demise of the Knowledge ...
... Warnings in Products Liability Design Defect Litigation Comes of Age , " 61 Cornell Law Review 495 ( 1976 ) . 2 ... Warn Defect After Barker v . Lull Engineering Co .: Preservation of the Limited Duty and Demise of the Knowledge ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning