California Trial Lawyers Journal, Volume 19California Trial Lawyers Association., 1981 - Law |
From inside the book
Results 1-3 of 6
Page 68
... County where attendance is required , for issuance of a subpoena duces tecum from that County . If the records sought are outside California , and , the State in which the records are located has adopted the Uniform Foreign Depositions ...
... County where attendance is required , for issuance of a subpoena duces tecum from that County . If the records sought are outside California , and , the State in which the records are located has adopted the Uniform Foreign Depositions ...
Page 91
... County area there are at least two jury report services which usually state the names of the doctors who have testified for both plaintiff and defense . The case " write - ups " of these verdicts will indicate which are malpractice ...
... County area there are at least two jury report services which usually state the names of the doctors who have testified for both plaintiff and defense . The case " write - ups " of these verdicts will indicate which are malpractice ...
Page 11
... County Finance Company v . Iriart , ( 1930 ) 26 Cal . App . 2d 483 , 79 P. 2d 763 . Generally the inquiry made by the court is quite limited and is done in a pro forma manner , not particularly informative and frequently with an ...
... County Finance Company v . Iriart , ( 1930 ) 26 Cal . App . 2d 483 , 79 P. 2d 763 . Generally the inquiry made by the court is quite limited and is done in a pro forma manner , not particularly informative and frequently with an ...
Contents
Arne Werchick Esq San Francisco | 9 |
Is the Danger Excessive | 33 |
The Trial of a Medical Malpractice Case | 63 |
5 other sections not shown
Other editions - View all
Common terms and phrases
accident attorney award Barker barred benefit plan breast cancer Cal.Rptr California Supreme Court cause Civil Procedure claims Code of Civil compensation consumer cost counsel CTLA curling iron defendant defendant's deposition design defect determine developer doctor employee ERISA established evaluation Evidence Code expert witness filed foreseeable future damages Hahn hazards hospital hypothetical question indemnity action independent contractor injured worker instructions involved issue judgment jurors jury Labor Code Section legislative Liptak litigation lump manufacturer medical expert medical malpractice medical records motion negligence opinion pain party patient periodic payments physician plaintiff premises presented prior Products Liability reasonable res ipsa result risk Rptr rule safety engineering San Francisco special employer special employment standard statute of limitations statute of repose strict liability subcontractor substantially completed Superior Court supra testify testimony tion tort trial court Trial Lawyers trier of fact utilized verdict victim voir dire Warning