Democracy in Plural Societies: A Comparative Exploration
While it may be difficult to achieve and maintain stable democratic governments in countries with deep religious, ideological, linguistic, cultural, or ethnic cleavages, Lijphart argues that it is not at all impossible. Through the analysis of political systems in six continents, he demonstrates that what he calls consociational democracy can be successful in severely divided or plural societies.
"Here, once again, Arend Lijphart is directing our attention to matters which will surely engage much of the attention of students of comparative politics in the next decade." G. Bingham Powell, Jr., American Political Science Review
"A study which can speak to such a wide audience in political science deserves a warm welcome from the profession." Government and Opposition
"A copybook example of the comparative method of political analysis, as well as indispensable reading for all who have an interest in the nature and prospects of representative democracy, whether in Europe or beyond."--The Times Higher Education Supplement
"This well-written work, containing a wealth of information on politics of many diverse nations, is highly recommended."--Library Journal
What people are saying - Write a review
We haven't found any reviews in the usual places.
Favorable Conditions for Consociational Democracy
Consociational Elements in Nonconsociational
Consociational Democracy in the Third World
The Consociational Example as Colonial Heritage
Adaptation of the Autonomy Principle
according Africa Almond angle Antilles argues Austria autonomy balance become Belgian Belgium British cabinet Canada cantons Catholic civil cleavages close colonial communal Comparative consociational democracy constitution cooperation countries crosscutting cultural decisions democratic divided division dominant Dutch economic effect elections elite equal especially ethnic European example extent extreme fact factor favorable federal four fragmentation French grand coalition groups homogeneous important included independence instance institutions interests International Ireland island Italy language leaders Lebanon less linguistic majority means ment method minority mutual Netherlands Northern opposition organizations parties percent plural societies points political population position present principle problem proportional proportionality question regard regime religious represented respect result rule segments separate significant social Socialist stability Study success Surinam Swiss Switzerland tend Third tion tional traditions United University Press veto vote Western World